Description

This study investigates the presence of dynamical patterns of interpersonal coordination in extended deceptive conversations across multimodal channels of behavior. Using a novel "devil’s advocate" paradigm, we experimentally elicited deception

This study investigates the presence of dynamical patterns of interpersonal coordination in extended deceptive conversations across multimodal channels of behavior. Using a novel "devil’s advocate" paradigm, we experimentally elicited deception and truth across topics in which conversational partners either agreed or disagreed, and where one partner was surreptitiously asked to argue an opinion opposite of what he or she really believed.

Reuse Permissions
  • application/pdf

    Download count: 0

    Details

    Date Created
    • 2017-06-02
    Resource Type
  • Text
  • Collections this item is in
    Identifier
    • Digital object identifier: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178140
    • Identifier Type
      International standard serial number
      Identifier Value
      1045-3830
    • Identifier Type
      International standard serial number
      Identifier Value
      1939-1560

    Citation and reuse

    Cite this item

    This is a suggested citation. Consult the appropriate style guide for specific citation guidelines.

    Duran, N. D., & Fusaroli, R. (2017). Conversing with a devil’s advocate: Interpersonal coordination in deception and disagreement. Plos One, 12(6). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0178140

    Machine-readable links