Description

Large-N comparative studies have helped common pool resource scholars gain general insights into the factors that influence collective action and governance outcomes. However, these studies are often limited by missing

Large-N comparative studies have helped common pool resource scholars gain general insights into the factors that influence collective action and governance outcomes. However, these studies are often limited by missing data, and suffer from the methodological limitation that important information is lost when we reduce textual information to quantitative data. This study was motivated by nine case studies that appeared to be inconsistent with the expectation that the presence of Ostrom’s Design Principles increases the likelihood of successful common pool resource governance.

Reuse Permissions
  • application/pdf

    Download count: 0

    Details

    Contributors
    Date Created
    • 2016-09-09
    Resource Type
  • Text
  • Collections this item is in
    Identifier
    • Digital object identifier: 10.18352/ijc.632
    • Identifier Type
      International standard serial number
      Identifier Value
      1875-0281
    Note

    Citation and reuse

    Cite this item

    This is a suggested citation. Consult the appropriate style guide for specific citation guidelines.

    Barnett, A. J., Baggio, J. A., Shin, H. C., Yu, D. J., Perez-Ibarra, I., Rubinos, C., . . . Janssen, M. A. (2016). An iterative approach to case study analysis: insights from qualitative analysis of quantitative inconsistencies. International Journal of the Commons, 10(2), 467. doi:10.18352/ijc.632

    Machine-readable links